100,000+ people · cited in 40+ publications

Ask anything about EU regulation.

Cited from the official record — or it refuses to answer. Grounded in live Parliament, Commission and Transparency Register data.

0 of 5 free

Answered live, with real citations — 5 free, no signup.

The signature

Cited — or it refuses.

The one thing a regulatory tool can't get wrong is making something up. So every claim links to a primary source, and when the record doesn't support an answer, Lex says so.

meetlex.eu / ask
Who is lobbying on the AI Act, and how did Parliament vote?
The AI Act CELEX 32024R1689 drew 142 disclosed meetings, led by Google, Microsoft and DigitalEurope TR · meetings. Parliament adopted it on 13 March 2024, 523 – 46 – 49 EP · roll-call.
I won't estimate any single MEP's “influence” — a disclosed meeting is a record of contact, not influence.
Try it on real questions

The kind of answer you get back.

Does the CSRD apply to a 280-person company?
Under the 2024 “stop-the-clock” changes, CSRD scope shifted for many large undertakings. Thresholds turn on turnover, balance sheet and headcount — Lex won't confirm yours from public data, and says so.
EUR-Lex · 32022L2464refused to guess
What's the status of the EU AI Act?
Reg (EU) 2024/1689 entered into force on 1 Aug 2024 and applies in phases — bans first, GPAI transparency from 2 Aug 2025, most high-risk duties through 2026–2027.
EUR-Lex · 32024R1689EP · OEIL
Who is shaping CBAM in Parliament?
Here are the disclosed MEP and Commission meetings on CBAM, ranked by organisation, each with its source — reported as records of contact, never as evidence of influence.
Transparency Registercontact, not influence
every answer built only on official EU sources
EUR-LexEuropean ParliamentTransparency RegisterEuropean CommissionOEIL
How it's grounded

Three rules behind every answer.

Retrieve

From the official record

Each question runs a retrieval over live EUR-Lex, European Parliament, Commission and Transparency Register data — not a model's memory of them.

Cite

Every claim links back

Figures, dates and names are bound to the exact record they came from, so you can check the source behind any sentence in one click.

Refuse

Silence beats a guess

When the record can't support an answer, Lex refuses and tells you what it can verify — the calibration that lets you forward it.

One graph, two instruments

Every read stands on a neutral, cited public record.

0
substantive EU laws
0
lobbying organisations
0
disclosed meetings
0
MEPs · votes · income
0%
claims linked to source
wheresmymep.eu (free accountability) meetlex.eu (paid intelligence) — keyed to the same official IDs

Map it, then keep asking.

See your whole EU exposure in one scan, or keep the map live with Monitor.

FAQ

Ask Lex, answered.

How is this different from asking a general chatbot?+

Lex answers only from live official EU records and links the source behind every figure, date and name. It doesn't draw on training-data memory, and when the record can't support an answer it refuses instead of guessing.

What does "it refuses" actually mean?+

If you ask about a file, MEP or position that isn't in the public record — or your figures aren't disclosed — Lex says so and points you to what it can verify, rather than inventing a plausible-sounding answer. That refusal is the feature.

Where does the data come from?+

EUR-Lex, the European Parliament Legislative Observatory and roll-call votes, the EU Transparency Register, and Commission meeting disclosures. Every cited claim links back to its official record.

Is it free?+

You get 5 questions a day with no login. Sign up free to keep asking across the full dataset; Monitor and the Exposure Report add saved maps, weekly briefs and verified reports.

Can I forward an answer to my GC or a client?+

Yes — that's the point. Because every claim is one click from the official source, an answer holds up when you send it on. When Lex isn't sure, the refusal travels with it.