Regulation (EU) 2024/1623

What it is

to amend Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor with a view to making the EU banking sector more resilient to potential future economic shocks. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: following the major financial crisis of 2008-2009, the EU and its G20 partners in the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision reached the Basel IIII agreement to make banks more resilient to potential economic shocks. Thanks to the reforms already implemented, the EU banking sector entered the COVID-19 crisis on a much more resilient footing. However, while the overall level of capital in EU banks is now satisfactory on average, some of the problems that were identified in the wake of the financial crisis have not yet been addressed. The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Jonás FERNÁNDEZ (S&D, ES) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor. As a reminder, the proposal amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR) as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor aims to contribute to financial stability and to the steady financing of the economy in the context of the post-COVID-19 crisis recovery. It aims to strengthen and facilitate the allocation of capital and liquidity within banking groups in Europe without imposing a significant increase in their capital requirements. The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows: Members recalled that the output floor represents one of the key measures of the Basel III reforms. It aims at limiting the unwarranted variability in the regulatory capital requirements produced by internal models and the excessive reduction in capital that an institution using internal models can derive relative to an institution using the revised standardised approaches. Those institutions can do so by setting a lower limit to the capital requirements that are produced by institutions’ internal models to 72.5% of the capital requirements that would apply if standardised approaches were used by those institutions. Implementing the output floor faithfully should increase the comparability of the institutions’ capital ratios, restore the credibility of internal models and ensure that there is a level playing field between institutions that use different approaches to calculate capital requirements. To harmonise the internal market for banking, the approach for the output floor should be coherent with the principle of risk aggregation across different…

Frequently asked